Jump to content

fabiosun

Supervisor
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,274

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    533

 Content Type 

Everything posted by fabiosun

  1. fabiosun
    @scipionehai controllato il SIP di quel sistema? magari devi attivarla oppure potresti provare a fare un enroll con hack Check ma meglio prima controllare sip
  2. fabiosun
    ciao e benvenuto se vedi la struttura del sito troverai le varie aree dedicate.. una prima indicazione e' su che sistema intendi installare, capito questo trovi la relativa area ed apri il tuo thread nella sottosezione notebook della stessa, se presente. altrimenti nell'area generale del sistema che stai tentando di installare Se metti nella tua firma il nome del portatile e le sue caratteristiche, chi ha esperienza di notebook ti dirà se stai perdendo del tempo o hai possibilità di successo..e nel caso positivo..che sistema operativo e' supportato dal tuo PC 🙂
  3. fabiosun
    @tuxybefore I was in a rush..so I will explain better public patches on AMD allow to boot till beta 3 if you have followed well also a not included patch you can find here or on insanely Mac : Force set cpuid_cores_per_package with this patch you can disable many other patches (broken for b2 and b3) so a conditional yes is a better answer to your question. 🙂 this patch is instead the one changed from previous beta 1 and available on AMD OSX Github: algrey _cpuid_set_cpufamily - Force CPUFAMILY_INTEL_PENRYN
  4. fabiosun
    @tuxyyes 😉
  5. fabiosun
    No no quella se riesci a prenderla a buon prezzo è ottima il pc che hai non la sfrutta tutta perche il processore è limitato(detta alla buona) ma è un ottima scheda se non la paghi più di 280 euro
  6. fabiosun
    11.5 released same RC2 version
  7. fabiosun
    Confermata la versione di RC2
  8. fabiosun
    @Arrakisfrom this EFi and its related config.plist you can disable patch n.6: algrey - cpuid_set_generic_info - disable check to allow leaf7 then I see also this enabled: ProvideCurrentCpuInfo if you enable this you can disable: 13 and 14: algrey - tsc_init - remove Penryn check to execute default case algrey - tsc_init - grab DID and VID from MSR with ProvideCurrentCpuInfo is also included this patch as you know: algrey - cpu_topology_sort -disable _x86_validate_topology I still haven't been able to figure out who wins if the quirk and patch topology are activated at the same time I asked for clarifications but at the moment I have not received them 😉
  9. fabiosun
    sorry, I see now you are in Big Sur OS and so it could be unrelated your CPU panic . For many problems are with new patches for Monterey, overall for beta 2 an 3.. I am lucky, with my MSI and 3970x I have had no panic if I do not experiment too much Proxmox way is different story and there many AMD cpu instruction are bypassed by virtualisation
  10. fabiosun
    ciao @Allubzit seems (it is a my only opinion not confirmed by facts) that many users with 3960x have some problem, do you use Dummypowermanagement quirk? maybe that problem I see also in @Arrakisrig could be topology related... I will stay with regular Opencore and use old way to patch core count
  11. fabiosun
    ciao @Nestorse l'hack che usi e' quello in firma e' anche sovradimensionata!
  12. fabiosun
    @Driftwood i can’t be an example because in this task I did many experimental test with also unreleased patches or Efi, also with clover bootloader. now I am also using an unreleased count core patch included in a opencore debug release(I can’t see the difference in hex because it is yet compiled). all this to say that in my case I have had zero problems to update from 11.4.11.5 12b1 or greater i am using a simple configuration as usual and only aquantia Ethernet and a pciex4 adapter for my third NVME drive. Motherboard nvme are fulfilled like 7sata ports with mechanical disks Listening on the net some people have different problems to update overall on beta 3 i can’t say it because I hadn’t this problem at all. by the way happy filming👍
  13. fabiosun
  14. fabiosun
    RC2
  15. fabiosun
    CINEBENCH R15.038 I use this version , I hope it works also for you
  16. fabiosun
    I did in this way (sip disabled) otherwise I have this:
  17. fabiosun
    Ciao Carlo above 4g i can use also off on 4g try by now 🙂 edit: no differences here
  18. fabiosun
    Benchmarking Monterey B3 and new PR EFI: in Cinebench 23 84° (4* more than Big Sur ) and a bit less of multicore benchmark
  19. fabiosun
    After the countless tests done in this period, which still continue, I got to enjoy a little beta 3 with the programs I use Adobe suite works perfectly with the apps I use (Photoshop, After Effects, Media encoder and Premiere Pro) Blackmagic Davinci Resolve also seems to have no obvious problems Another positive note is also that the sleep / wake continues to work perfectly well!
  20. fabiosun
    Ok I would have liked to prepare an Efi for you i respect your decision👍
  21. fabiosun
    @Arrakiswould you like to try a different approach? clover bootloader I mean let me know if you like
  22. fabiosun
    It seems many people have some problems to update to beta 3 from Big sur I have had no problem in update from beta 1 and from 11.5 rc also all is fine from a clean installation from usb pen
  23. fabiosun
    could you see if you do a step more with this? config-3-Arrakis.plist.zip
  24. fabiosun
    @Arrakis I was seeing your EFI posted in the first post of this thread. Opencore 070 and use of the patch: algrey - cpu_topology_sort -disable _x86_validate_topology this patch later included in the ProvideCurrentCpuInfo quirk It allows you to start without having that patch in the config.plist just by activating the mentioned quirk The patch in that form is no longer available, there is another one instead: XLNC - Disable _x86_validate_topology - 10.13/10.14/10.15/11.0/12.0 It is completely different and, in my opinion, much more invasive Now, it seems that you are unable to use neither this patch nor the quirk to go through the second phase of the installation .. I would not want the patch in this form to be invalid for your cpu. Although, in case it could be a big problem even for users of platforms lower than ours have to try asking other x570 platform users if they use this patch on their working rigs In case, can you post the config.plist you are trying to start Monterey with? thank you
  25. fabiosun
    @Arrakis i cant see on your image first KP part.. dummypowermanagemt is in my opinion the last thing to understand well togheter topology patch you need (included now in ProvideCpuInfo quirk)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.