fabiosun
-
Posts
10,637 -
Joined
-
Days Won
442
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Everything posted by fabiosun
-
per quanto riguarda invece la rete io ti consiglio di leggere qui se il blocco e' la rete (ma dubito) non mettere il kext in other e prova ad installare poi segui qui: oppure se te la senti flashi via una live di ubuntu l'id delle ethernet sage (non consigliato anche se non e' complesso)
-
questo deve essere disabilitato ..altrimenti non parti mai
-
About frequency , temperature and PBO bios settings on my MSI trx40 pro 10g PBO enabled cinebench 17749 temps about 88 degrees 3ds max rendering in vray 95 degrees and maybe CPU throttling PBO auto cinebench 16540 temps about 75 3dsmax rendering in vray 85 degrees same ambient temps and same bios settings only difference is PBO settings above idle temps about 53 degrees
-
non riesco a seguire molto per altri problemi..ma se stai ancora creando la chiavetta di installazione perché il titolo dice post installazione? Hai installato quindi?
-
@Driftwoodi have downloaded using Apple store I have only converted it with VM Assistant to download from Apple store you can read here or use a similar method till @Gengik84 will check his app
-
Thank you @Rox67er have you seen in this condition max frequency reached during occt stress test? and temperature reached in 5 minute test as you did before?
-
Yesterday with the help of @Gengik84i did a fresh installation on my system of Big Sur using a beta version of VM assistant app now available in download section. I have downloaded Big sur complete installation app and converted in an iso file with VM. i have created a copy of my standard VM.conf file(100.conf) renamed it in 102.conf and modified cpu host to Penryn and also boot args with that ones you can find in original guide with OSK and others args. uploaded on proxmox Big sur iso and created a cdrom for it in web interface as usual. in this way is possible to start with opencore and execute first and second installation steps. then i have replaced again cpu host and boot args with my original used ones and system boots fine in big sur So now i have done a fresh installation also in Proxmox using only original Apple installation big sur app. tested on a sata disk and also in a vm disk (512gb/48gb)
-
@Driftwood I have used the same proxmox configuration and I use only a single EFI to boot in HighSierra, Mojave, Catalina, Big Sur No new guide needed I think. It is only "tricky" by now how to install 'cause Opencore needs some adjustment I think if you want use a "traditional" installer. If you have a real Mac dmg or a vm dmg of Big Sur, you can install as I said above (on a windows pc via transmac) and then using your actual opencore efi with only those adding I posted above 🙂 I can't do many things because I have the same Nvidia as before..to surf on web, audio and others stuff are working the same as I have in Catalina OS
-
@Rox67er try to put PBO in enable from auto (if you want 🙂 ) if you see my freq is @ about 4000 on all cores (i use PBO enable button, in auto it is different in my MSI (lower))
-
I used windows to create a Big Sur disk via Transmac/ full Big Sur dmg then I have this value in Nvram part of my config: I can omit (not sure it is the same also for you by now) -lilubetaall and also delete part in Nvram
-
Update 29/06/2020 new kernel release in proxmox distribution site With these kernel you can avoid to use FLR patch to pass problematic usb and audio controllers I see No others benefits in my testing with this new kernel
-
Done 🙂
-
evvivaaaaaa
-
Big Sur... initial results...I need a radeon GFX 🙂
-
with MSI boards it is possible to check temperature using internal Q-code display In my case I see very high temperature when I put in a playing loop 500 or more tracks in Logic Pro
-
io ho installato con la vm inizialmente da Catalina su un disco nuovo, al primo riavvio OpenCore vede l'icona di installazione che fa tranquillamente al terzo riavvio..i problemi di tutti 🙂
-
@iGPU@all liquid cooling owners on this beast 🙂 could you check temperatures during cinebench 20 (4 run) and maybe during Logic Pro benchmark or more similar bench which stress a bit our cpu? I am convinced that air is not enough for our cpu..also with a pretty good as Noctua or Dark pro tr4 cooling system Thank you I have no problem..but temperature during long benchmark can pass easily 90° (celsius)
-
Welcome I hope the same also for you
-
@DriftwoodI have done a direct install from Catalina to a mechanical disk first and second step ok, then it fails when I have to create the users and choosing language but I have not tried so much because not useful in my actual pipeline 🙂
-
quel tool non e' che produca una EFI bellissima 😛 proverei piano piano a fartela da solo se ne hai una che ti va con clover ..non dovrebbe essere difficile
-
Alessandro, non so tu cosa fai nella vita professionale...io dal mio punto di vista ti dico che ho avuto (anche per gli anni che ho) postazioni dual xeon da 88 cores / threads tutte le cpu Extreme edition uscite.. a me dei nm me ne puo' fregare come appassionato..ma come "professionista" me ne sbatto (perdonami il termine. Io decido un budget e poi mi guardo intorno..si puo' anche chiamare spectrum o Atari ..o amiga Intel e' indietro..ed i chiplet che sembrano non piacerti sono un passo eccezionale dal mio punto di vista Io paragono esclusivamente programmi che uso..e non sono molti.. e oggi AMD come cpu e' il top non solo per low user ma per tutte le fasce.. Apple avendo fatto un'altra scelta (credo per loro più' proficua) ha quasi messo una pietra tombale sul reparto pc (per determinati utilizzi) Cmq vedremo...ma oggi AMD ha spaccato il mercato e per le cpu puo' fare lei il bello ed il cattivo tempo..e lo vedi sui prezzi delle cpu top
-
Big Sur installed..for now no boot 😂
-
vm 104.conf (Windows) bios: ovmf bootdisk: sata0 cores: 56 cpu: host efidisk0: local-lvm:vm-104-disk-1,size=4M hostpci0: 21:00,pcie=1,x-vga=1 hostpci1: 46:00.3 hostpci2: 04:00.3 hostpci3: 23:00.3 hostpci6: 46:00.1 ide0: local:iso/virtio-win-0.1.173.iso,media=cdrom,size=384670K machine: q35 memory: 65536 name: Windows net0: e1000=xx:90:xx:45:xF:xx,bridge=vmbr0,firewall=1 numa: 0 ostype: win10 sata0: local-lvm:vm-104-disk-0,size=32G scsihw: virtio-scsi-pci smbios1: uuid=xxxxx sockets: 1 tablet: 0 vga: none vmgenid: xxxxx vm 100.conf (OSX) #hostpci11%3A 04%3A00.3 #hostpci7%3A 23%3A00.3 #hostpci8%3A 62%3A00.0 #hostpci8%3A 46%3A00.3 #hostpci8%3A 42%3A08.0 #usb0%3A host=04d9%3A1702 #usb1%3A host=046d%3Ac050 #usb2%3A host=0c76%3A161f #hostpci12%3A 49%3A00 #hostpci9%3A 46%3A00.1 #hostpci13%3A 23%3A00.4 agent: 0 args: -smbios type=2 -cpu host,vendor=GenuineIntel,+invtsc balloon: 0 bios: ovmf boot: d cores: 56 cpu: host efidisk0: local-lvm:vm-100-disk-1,size=4M hostpci0: 21:00,pcie=1,x-vga=1 hostpci1: 46:00.1 hostpci10: 46:00.3 hostpci11: 47:00 hostpci12: 48:00 hostpci2: 01:00.0 hostpci3: 02:00.0 hostpci4: 04:00.3 hostpci5: 23:00.3 hostpci6: 23:00.4 hostpci7: 44:00 hostpci8: 45:00 ide2: local:iso/r5107.iso,cache=unsafe machine: q35 memory: 121856 name: sierra net0: vmxnet3=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx,bridge=vmbr0,firewall=1 numa: 0 ostype: other sata0: local-lvm:vm-106-disk-0,cache=unsafe,size=48G,ssd=1 scsihw: virtio-scsi-pci smbios1: xxxxxx sockets: 1 startup: down=20 tablet: 0 vga: none vmgenid: xxxxxxx
-
tested now both Catalina amd high Sierra hang in my case I have tested to boot in windows via opencore boot loader launched from proxmox and it starts well not tested ( I will do in a touch) my windows vm (no real disk) And second pictures is a vm disk (Proxmox Windows 10)..in both VM I have put 56 as cores number (1 socket) in VM situation first boot produces a hang , no proxmox logo. I have signals on both monitors but black screen) hard reset system restart again and it booted Intersting to see that booting with real Windows installation (I use it normally) system is seen as an intel using my vm conf file (100.conf) Using 104.conf file (windows VM config) system is seen as an AMD with 56 cores
-
@A23SS4NDRO avvicinato nel 2019? Diciamo che gli gira intorno con le ultime cpu...altrimenti intel non avrebbe dimezzato i suoi top di gamma..e non avrebbe fatto fiasco come lo ha fatto con la ‘nuovissima’ 10980 xe.... il processo produttivo del fornitore intel è indubbiamento migliore...ma oggi intel è almeno 2 anni dietro ad amd per sviluppo.
