fabiosun
-
Posts
11,289 -
Joined
-
Days Won
534
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Everything posted by fabiosun
-
for me Catalina is working well as high sierra if I consider USB job I pass all controllers less audio controller (xx:00.4) In Catalina usb is threated differently and USB drivers work as they do in a window VM (as bare metal), in High Sierra driver is old and for now I can use only USB 2.0 device. for both no lag at all Pay attention (for lag stuff) if you have some WIFI/BT which need usb power)..I haven't ..but it is problematic if you have
-
@Driftwood Apple has worked for me 🙂 catalina 10.15.5 solved my audio problem and then I have said to Pavo this and also him reached my same situation with his trx40 system (audio perfect but jack detection problematic) Now I think he is trying with Unraid and see if there could be the same or better. For now I stay in Proxmox. system is production ready and no so much time to invest to learn Unraid
-
Yes in that line new proxmox release does not need anymore of mce=off
-
Also I do not use actual patch you can find in pavo GitHub but older ones. I think he is doing multi platform experiment with this patches to try to solve Problem for other platform. I think also @Pavo could confirm this as he did in private few hour ago @iGPUif you have another working Linux you can compile by yourself I prefer @Pavogive you clear instruction because he has helped me to understand how. to all audio is working and the only problem now is audio jack Detection. by the way now i think pavo had some success we audio in unraid. Maybe it could be useful also in proxmox understand well how Unraid works
-
@Driftwood you are not informed well😀 Audio is working well in latest Catalina and it is not flr patch related
-
1) no command line does not work . It must be on kernel 2) i asked to pavo to compile for me a kernel with 148c because we (all trx40 users) need of this id i do not know if actual patches in his github are the same he did for me on my request time ago
-
I would check your mb manual..because it seems vfio plugin is wrong no experience with unraid but for me is weird
-
On image you write asmedia 48:00.1 and this for me is not so
-
Thanks @iGPU it is similar to mine 04:00.3 25:00.3 could be passed with flr patch (148c) 48:00.1 and 48:00.3 pass as is without patch 44 is asmedia..i do not pass it because i have proxmox on it i do not consider any additional device you can have but msi creator has pretty similar group also @pavo has one and he is achieving the same my result
-
@iGPU could you post lspci -nnk output of this msi board? I would like to check because iommu seems to be weird
-
Hi, maybe I am missing something...are you sure of this picture above? In your pdf on your GitHub there are differences.. 🙂and as it is should not boot (gfx is not there) with our trx40 is better to pass entire usb controllers and not single device..single device may loose many functionality
-
This is my last schema. I can pass more stuff but all usb in my motherboard are owned by 46:00 controller...ah also audio is in there VM OS system limit USB3 detection (High Sierra) Catalina and Windows 64 have a better USB management (their drivers allow to see USB 3 devices if connected . So to a clean installation in my MSI TRX40 Pro 10G I do not use any FLR patch (no need to passthrough 23:00.3, 4:00.3 USB Controllers or 23:00.4 audio controller it is also mandatory to pass 4:00.3 and 23:00.3 (FLR Patch 148c) (do not pass 23:00:4 audio controller) All I need is 46:00, 4:00.3 and 23:00.3 controllers which I can passthrough in two different way: Hostpci5: 46:00 or hostpci6: 46:00.1 hostpci7: 46:00.3 then hostpci7: 04:00.3 hostpci7: 23:00.3 I think also for you should be the same (you have also to find your main USB controller and your exact groups). Interesting is also to check this schematic picture, inside USB/audio/chipset connections with AMD CPU:
-
new agesa 🙂
-
If any of you have time and desire to read I have explained here what I understood about my USB controllers and how they are managed by Proxmox. I hope for an answer that will enlighten us in understanding some small parts that are missing to have a more capillary control over the Proxmox / OSX coupling https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/trx40-amd-usb-controllers-question.70504/
-
If you have a trx40 system is better to use opencore for many aspects is more friendly 😉
-
@cj750 welcome here I will happy you also partecipate with your point of view. It is interesting to see also newbie (in this task) experience..because maybe we are doing the same errors 🙂 If you have time put your rig in signature so we can see better motherboard and cpu you use 🙂 Thank you
-
@iGPU i cant say where your problem is but i am pretty confident is about proxmox if you see also on proxmox forum the staff answer are often not clear..like “you are on bleeding new hardware untested and so on “ apart of this i think proxmox is the best linux distro for our goal and maybe more simple to master in many aspect. As advise for all and also for me is to pass less things possible related to usb..because main problem are there in relation with osx driver and qemu pve.cfg. i loose so many time to have a working audio in highsierra when in windows it was working well and the solutions was in front of my eyes...driver. catalina solved this problem and i am using the same linux and vm config previously used. and also catalina is using audio driver in a worst way than windows..but now it works. So this is a fact not in our hands. i can now using my system professionally with highsierra using dp audio but i have to accept some limitation (usb 3 device are not seen if i pass controllers or single device) but system is solid rock and fast as windows in cpu/gpu jobs Osx for me has a sense only with highsierra and catalina for now it is a no solution for me.. also in catalina i could no accept amd gpu reset bug! but in general our needs could differ
-
@iGPUare your memory tested? I think also you have verified this failure in a different os environment than proxmox/OS X
-
All problem we have (except gpu amd reset bug) are related to proxmox—->OS X usb driver version then stuff like WiFi or Bt could also be related to our weird problem in conjunction with passed usb controllers later I will try to explain more in detail and I would grateful if some of you could do some tries to confirm this @Jaidy to start you have to connect to cabled ethernet it seems your WiFi card is not seen by default proxmox driver you can also find a driver for it but in this way you are adding additional difficulty to your starting proxmox/Linux learning curve
-
Catalina 10.15.5? No
-
@pavo and other user seem to have solved audio problem with this parameter to add in grub : pcie_aspm=off In my case it is not necessary but just in case you can try to use only 10.15.5 solved for me this problem @Rox67er audio problem is surely related to usb or as usb audio drivers works in OS X with our audio double bridged
-
If I understand well it seems more probable it is related to amd Gpu reset bug?
-
hai provato aq lanciare qualche bench grafico? di solito alcune schede moderne iniziano a farle girare vicino a 60 gradi
-
@Rox67er no benefit to pass SMBus. I have tried to pass all controllers I can during my test about 99 error, have you tried to reflash your bios and clear CMOS before configure it as you need?
-
seeing your VM conf I could imagine which some problem could happen to your system because you allocate (maybe) to much memory for VM if you have in total 128Gb..in my case in my previous attempts I have had put about 122000..and vm not was stable in that case I am not using also huge page stuff.. is it useful for you? and so when/where do you see benefit?
