fabiosun

I have sold (maybe) my 6900xt i will buy it again after a solid drivers support i hope soon...😂

no per ora niente

helper card..waiting for... 🙂

10:031 00:002 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - commpage_populate -remove rdmsr replace count - 1 10:032 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 0 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - commpage_populate -remove rdmsr) - Success 10:034 00:002 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_cache_info - cpuid 0x8000001D instead 4 replace count - 1 10:035 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 1 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_cache_info - cpuid 0x8000001D instead 4) - Success 10:037 00:002 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_cache_info - don't set cpuid_cores_per_package replace count - 1 10:038 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 2 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_cache_info - don't set cpuid_cores_per_package) - Success 10:040 00:002 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_generic_info - remove wrmsr replace count - 1 10:040 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 3 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_generic_info - remove wrmsr) - Success 10:042 00:002 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_generic_info - set flag=1 replace count - 1 10:043 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 4 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_generic_info - set flag=1) - Success 10:047 00:004 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_generic_info - disable check to allow leaf7 replace count - 1 10:048 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 5 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_generic_info - disable check to allow leaf7) - Success 10:058 00:009 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_info - GenuineIntel to AuthenticAMD replace count - 1 10:058 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 6 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_info - GenuineIntel to AuthenticAMD) - Success 10:129 00:070 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_cpufamily - force CPUFAMILY_INTEL_PENRYN replace count - 0 10:129 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 7 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_cpufamily - force CPUFAMILY_INTEL_PENRYN) - Not Found 10:131 00:001 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_info - jmp to calculations and set cpuid_cores_per_package - 10.15/10.16 replace count - 1 10:131 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 8 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_info - jmp to calculations and set cpuid_cores_per_package - 10.15/10.16) - Success 10:133 00:001 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_info - cores and threads calculations - 10.15/10.16 replace count - 1 10:134 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 9 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - cpuid_set_info - cores and threads calculations - 10.15/10.16) - Success 10:200 00:066 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - i386_init - remove rdmsr (x3) replace count - 3 10:201 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 10 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - i386_init - remove rdmsr (x3)) - Success 10:203 00:002 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - tsc_init - remove Penryn check to execute default case replace count - 1 10:204 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 11 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - tsc_init - remove Penryn check to execute default case) - Success 10:206 00:002 OCAK: 64-bit cata_BS_algrey - tsc_init - grab DID and VID from MSR replace count - 1 10:207 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 12 for kernel (cata_BS_algrey - tsc_init - grab DID and VID from MSR) - Success 10:207 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher skips kernel (cata_algrey - lapic_init - remove version check and panic - 10.15) patch at 13 due to version 190000 <= 200400 <= 199999 10:210 00:002 OCAK: 64-bit BS_NoOne - lapic_init - remove version check and panic - 10.16 replace count - 1 10:210 00:000 OC: Kernel patcher result 14 for kernel (BS_NoOne - lapic_init - remove version check and panic - 10.16) - Success

yes 😛

Confermato... si blocca subito! al primo reboot attendere Prego 🙂

no and maybe CONFIRMED also kernel patches are not good by now... Pay attention

ole''' grazie @A23SS4NDRO

Welcome here! 🙂

To have a hope for GPU support Apple has to release 11.2 final..and then release first 11.3 beta..... 🙂

@Rox67ernow i am using not so much OSX (no gpu support) but for me reduced set of patches is working well in all my tasks..not problem at all and same beaviour with normal full set.. I am not using Affinity app so i cant say more

hi Crash welcome here 🙂

welcome here!

Update went fine! No BIG navi 2 support also in this RC2!

OK. in my case MMIO are the same also with both options on.. system in bios configuration does not boot if both are enabled

MMIO with resize bar on and 4G off are the same of my previous bios with only 4g option ON I will try if it with always mmio list if it hangs with both options on 🙂

however confirmed also in bare metal system Is booting with resize bar on and 4 g off obviously I can't test any performance improvement 🙂

ciao @Driftwood it's a bit of a contradiction to activate the resize bar and disable 4g ... but if you are trying .... happy for your testing 🙂

@Driftwoodit is an OS problem for now so we have to hope that resize bar is a useful option also for future Mac in my case in windows I can't see any improvements or other lack of performances

benvenuto, bei componenti ma la tua scheda grafica non e' supportata su OSX (non ci sono drivers per Nvidia) Puoi invece provare ad utilizzare la grafica integrata del processore (Grafica Intel® UHD 630)

🙂 avevi postato in guide, ho spostato io nelle discussioni generali di Big Sur buona fortuna @nycooo prova anche a leggere da qui [z490] iHack20.1 : ASRock Z490 Extreme 4, CPU Ix 10x00 - Desktop - MacOS86

di nulla, e sarebbe un peccato in quanto il resto e' un bel sistema... se cerchi un thread di @Gengik84trovi una piattaforma simile per capire come muoverti nel caso vuoi provare a far funzionare ugualmente il tuo sistema in OSX

tra parentesi, la tua GPU Nvidia non e' supportata in OSX e nel caso potresti utilizzare solo la integrata che hai nella CPU mi pare e' una Grafica Intel® UHD 630

no, ma ti ci sei messo almeno.. ora ti ho messo io in firma il tuo hardware poi ripulisco il thread appena hai risposto alle altre cose 😛 Sistema operativo che stai provando a far partire? Metodo di creazione di USB o da dove stai tentando di partire? l'errore in foto dice 0! 😉