Jump to content

AMD Threadripper 3990x Issues

23d1

By 23d1
in General

 Share

Recommended Posts

23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 hours ago, Rox67er said:

Do you have DummyPowerManagement enabled? (Should be disabled)

 

592656842_Screenshot2021-10-14at19_48_19.thumb.png.98d5ea97fb776fedf3f8953b6c15a233.png

 

Mine is working just fine (Same motherboard)

1176311072_Screenshot2021-10-14at19_49_13.png.25bd993a05470cdfa97e2a1c87fee826.png

 

While running Cinebench, I do run a low noise profile on my AIO so running a bit hot

1681924758_Screenshot2021-10-14at20_04_22.png.8fb74a0fbeb709e0b9cc974f0d198880.png

Yes, DummyPowerManagement is disabled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, fabiosun said:

great advice

I see many of you (ASRock creator users) use this quirk

But, if it not useful for you you should avoid that quirk

I've never had it enabled, should I try to enable it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, fabiosun said:

@23d1is that the previous you posted?

 

are you sure Do you have only a booting EFI in your system ?

I have downloaded again it and it is on true

If you used @DriftwoodEFI he has tha quirk on /yes/true 

 

Yes, I just mounted the EFI to check and grab that screenshot. Could it be my ProperTree not showing the right values? Everything else seems to be in order...

Edited by 23d1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, fabiosun said:

check if that you posted here (quoted one before) give the same

if so..you have a problem 😛

 

I hope there's a problem with the config, because I doubt anyone will solve any issues with 3990x anytime soon.

I suspect it just hasn't been tested thoroughly, seeing as most results in the Geekbench 5 database are within the same range.

config.plist.zip

Edited by 23d1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Supervisor
fabiosun Senior Member

fabiosun

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

config-2.plist.zip

and this is previous yours with correct value for dummy

I do not know if that quirk is useful or not for you because to some users solve some freeze after few minutes of OS usage

 

1 minute ago, 23d1 said:

I hope there's a problem, because I doubt anyone will solve the issue with 3990x anytime soon.

I think it just hasn't been tested thoroughly, seeing as most results in the Geekbench 5 database is within the same range.

config.plist.zip 5.77 kB · 0 downloads

this is good

 

On 10/13/2021 at 7:10 PM, 23d1 said:

Here it is.

config.zip 5.56 kB · 3 downloads

and this previous one posted (no)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, fabiosun said:

config-2.plist.zip 6 kB · 0 downloads

and this is previous yours with correct value for dummy

I do not know if that quirk is useful or not for you because to some users solve some freeze after few minutes of OS usage

 

this is good

 

and this previous one posted (no)

Weird, well... I wonder if disabling Above 4G Encoding would do anything, it did allow me to finally pass through my 6800XT to VM when launching via Qemu/Virt-Manager through arch. Haven't booted bare metal since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, fabiosun said:

if I have had this problem I will try to use an OpenCore debug version and I would post here log ...

Second option..

Send me your 3990x 🙂 🙂

 

Where do you guys find the beta releases? Right now I've just snagged what I could from posts here to got onto 0.7.5, the github repo is still on release 0.7.4. Figured I'd drop in the debug version. Here's a debug I generated with 0.7.4 a couple of tweaks back, but not sure if that one had DummyPowerManagement enabled (though I still have the same results with and without);

opencore-2021-10-13-230144.txt.zip

CPUInfo.txt.zip

Edited by 23d1
Added CPU txt...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Supervisor
fabiosun Senior Member

fabiosun

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted
9 minutes ago, 23d1 said:

Where do you guys find the beta releases? Right now I've just snagged what I could from posts here to got onto 0.7.5, the github repo is still on release 0.7.4. Figured I'd drop in the debug version. Here's a debug I generated with 0.7.4 a couple of tweaks back, but not sure if that one had DummyPowerManagement enabled (though I still have the same results with and without);

opencore-2021-10-13-230144.txt.zip 15.15 kB · 0 downloads

05:911 00:001 OCAK: Patch success dummy AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement

 

here is used

Link to comment
Share on other sites
23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
16 minutes ago, fabiosun said:

05:911 00:001 OCAK: Patch success dummy AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement

 

here is used

Here's the new log...

 

I guess this does stand out (also in previous log); 

00:519 00:010 OCCPU: Failed to get FSBFrequency data using Apple Platform Info - Not Found

FSB is the clock frequency multiplier, if I'm not mistaken.

Which is displayed earlier in the log; 

00:116 00:001 OCCPU: CPUFrequency  2899992542Hz  2899MHz
00:117 00:001 OCCPU: FSBFrequency   103571162Hz   103MHz

 

opencore-2021-10-15-071057.txt.zip

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Supervisor
fabiosun Senior Member

fabiosun

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted
16 minutes ago, 23d1 said:

Here's the new log...

 

I guess this does stand out (also in previous log); 


00:519 00:010 OCCPU: Failed to get FSBFrequency data using Apple Platform Info - Not Found

FSB is the clock frequency multiplier, if I'm not mistaken.

Which is displayed earlier in the log; 


00:116 00:001 OCCPU: CPUFrequency  2899992542Hz  2899MHz
00:117 00:001 OCCPU: FSBFrequency   103571162Hz   103MHz

 

opencore-2021-10-15-071057.txt.zip 13.71 kB · 0 downloads

 

not important that error but this yes :

2056355442_Screenshot2021-10-15at09_34_08.png.d34d93fff456ae332fcaad17442c9369.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, fabiosun said:

do you use this kext SMCAMDProcessor.kext for Istat menus?

 

try to test to disable it

 

I've actually tried. I first added just the AMDRyzenCPUPowerManagement.kext naively hoping that would fix my problems, then SMCAMDProcessor.kext, and it's all the same with or without. I have noticed that TDP actually goes up to 280W, I think it just happens when fully loaded at 2,9GHz and Cinebench doesn't really saturate the CPU for some reason, so it goes to about 270W. In either case, the clock remains unchanged. With PBO on in windows I get over 76000 points, and in macOS I hover around 41000-43000, no change in general, not even with PBO on. Huge performance loss, even greater with PBO on. In VM I get about 54000 points in macOS—but no sound at all. Hah.

Edited by 23d1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, fabiosun said:

difference in windows is so high with 32+32 cores? or with your default 64 +64?

 

44000 it fine if you use 32+32

but I would like to see a jumping frequency and a higher TDP

 

Isn't it technically 64+0?
In Windows is 64+64, with 64+0 I land around 60000 points.

 

I would settle for at least what I get through VM. 😅

Edited by 23d1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Supervisor
fabiosun Senior Member

fabiosun

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted (edited)

I would try as a real 3970x

so 32 + 32

then it should be better (for performance)

64+0

but try 32 +32 as all of us to have a correct comparison

then solve also your MMIO problem

do not mix stuff from VM or bare metal

keep them separate 🙂

 

Edited by fabiosun
Link to comment
Share on other sites
23d1 Member

23d1

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, fabiosun said:

I would try as a real 3970x

so 32 + 32

then it should be better (for performance)

64+0

but try 32 +32 as all of us to have a correct comparison

then solve also your MMIO problem

do not mix stuff from VM or bare metal

keep them separate 🙂

 

So you mean disable cores? Hmm. I thought disabling multithreading would simply make macOS "think" it was 32+32...

Damnit, they need to add support for more cores in the system.

 

Will look at the MMIO, must have been a setting I missed when defaulting the bios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.