fabiosun
-
Posts
11,530 -
Joined
-
Days Won
557
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Everything posted by fabiosun
-
@iGPU have you understood well snapshot stuff? /dev/disk8 (synthesized): #: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER 0: APFS Container Scheme - +249.8 GB disk8 Physical Store disk5s2 1: APFS Volume macOS_B-M - Data 3.9 GB disk8s1 2: APFS Volume Preboot 431.1 MB disk8s2 3: APFS Volume Recovery 761.5 MB disk8s3 4: APFS Volume macOS_B-M 15.1 GB disk8s4 5: APFS Snapshot com.apple.os.update-... 15.1 GB disk8s4s1 6: APFS Volume VM 1.1 MB disk8s6 this is my disk... I cant enable well to run sudo mount -uw / have you some advice, I see your post but it seems not work here (or better I am not able to do it 🙂 )
-
SIP in most of case (for you is not useful) In my case togheter snapshot deleting allows me to instal a patched Nvidia driver and avoid this error:
- 3,995 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- amd vanilla patches
- amd kernel patches
- (and 3 more)
-
To disable 7f080000 thanks @iCanaroto point me to a thread on insanelymac by fusion71au
-
also asked on AMD discord.. are you able to change SIP status from enable to disable as in previous beta we did easily? and..I see a wifi icon I have not in my system a wifi.. it is a problem I have had with first or second beta...
-
@meina222have you seen in your log if all are loaded with success?
-
you shouldn't have problem, only add new Algreys patches
-
I miss this one... have to test in this way thank you
-
I can boot with my efi, Pavo efi , Meina config (with imacpro Smbbios) with previous Big Sur beta (maybe this one is beta 5) With latesti it simply reboots I am trying to download again..but maybe I am between apple and Nvidia war 🙂 🙂
-
I have Nvidia, so I have additional problem (system unsupported with Mac Pro 7.1 smbios) my statement before was to say using all set of patches allow to boot all system if you use more than one..in every system only the right patches are loaded (ie in Big Sur , patches with max kernel lower than 20 are not loaded now I am trying a different thing..but only to be clear very happy it is working for you 🙂
-
Welcome here
-
PowerTool New features
- 3,995 replies
-
- 6
-
-
-
-
- amd vanilla patches
- amd kernel patches
- (and 3 more)
-
and this is the KP start..sorry for bad picture quality..I see some ACPI...but I can't be more precise
-
Ok if you see (with the due differences caused to the time zone of each of us)..many of us are working with algrey.. or rather we are testing what he proposes to do,also in DM.. in my case also booting with an his 10.13.6 compiled new kernel (not related to BS problem) for the moment without success We all hope to have it soon and to understand the current problem
-
Who do not believe in your testing? in my case as I said you and others in discord channel I have used Penryn because my vm config has always worked in this way with Big Sur installation step After installation I can always use my usual vm config but as you know also host cpu in vm does not mean it is the same as bare metal. I hope it does not need of many efforts in kernel patching. Howewer algrey asked to try a new one on discord (AMD ones) : try to bypass the function : FIND : E8 5C 61 01 00 REPLACE : 0F 1F 44 00 00 or this FIND : E8 E3 7B FF FF 48 85 C0 0F 99 05 B9 89 A0 00 48 8D 35 B2 89 A0 00 48 8D 3D 68 C9 74 00 BA 01 00 00 00 31 C9 E8 3F 67 6B 00 REPLACE : 66 66 66 0F 1F 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 66 66 0F 1F 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 66 66 0F 1F 84 00 00 00 00 00 0F 1F 84 00 00 00 00 00
-
I was trying this Now dinner time however if I use host as cpu same problem as in bare metal with penryn and usual boot args for vm two steps forward stopped for now I will try again tomorrow
-
Yes as early betas proxmox seems to install if I use penryn as host
- 3,995 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- amd vanilla patches
- amd kernel patches
- (and 3 more)
-
Pay attention something is broke in proxmox it seems to install
-
solo 3.61 gb 🙂
-
added @PloddlesEFI in OP thanks @Ploddles
- 3,995 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- amd vanilla patches
- amd kernel patches
- (and 3 more)
-
With your help I will add on above thread (pinned and locked) all useful links born from our discussion Added for now only MMIO @iGPUdetailed explanation and others generic I think useful Say your opinion and also help me to add there useful stuff for our community Thank you all! 🙂 🙂
-
Where it all began ( :) ) https://www.macos86.it/topic/2675-proxmox-ve-osx-guide-discussion/#comments Open Core EFI Maker https://www.macos86.it/files/file/20-opencore-efi-maker/ VM Assistant https://www.macos86.it/files/file/81-vm-assistant/ PowerTool https://www.macos86.it/files/file/91-powertool/ Hack Check Hack Check - Applications - MacOS86 Aquantia Patches https://www.macos86.it/topic/6064-aquantia-problem-for-trx40-and-others-solved/ TRX40 Vanilla method (also known as bare metal) discussion: https://www.macos86.it/topic/3307-trx40-bare-metal-vanilla-patches-yes-it-worksbutproxmox-is-better/?do=findComment&comment=82322 MMIO useful link - thanks @iGPU https://www.macos86.it/topic/3307-trx40-bare-metal-vanilla-patches-yes-it-worksbutproxmox-is-better/?do=findComment&comment=85469 Thunderbolt on TRX40...the ultimate challenge : https://www.macos86.it/topic/3282-gigabyte-titan-ridge-on-proxmoxosx-wip/#comments
-
home page di Nvidia
-
@mac-dev la tua scheda grafica non e' supportata in nessun sistema operativo Quindi se ti va bene al massimo avrai una risoluzione video senza accelerazione
-
che dopo tutta la premessa non ho capito quanto la paghi.. 😛 ma potrebbe essere la scelta giusta in generale e' meglio Da valutare quanto sia stata spremuta e se hai un minimo di garanzia residua
-
https://www.macos86.it/topic/3307-trx40-bare-metal-vanilla-patches-yes-it-worksbutproxmox-is-better/ I would do for now in this way We can find together all the data we think will be useful and also a better layout of the data provided Furthermore, in order not to leave everything to my free will, each user could create a message in the thread with the data of his configuration including EFI and Ioreg, from this message I will take the contents to be put in OP following the layout that we will define together. . How about? If there was a problem with, for example, a type of motherboard, an ad hoc thread could be created to deepen the matter. Can it work like this?
- 3,995 replies
-
- 2
-
-
-
- amd vanilla patches
- amd kernel patches
- (and 3 more)
